
What most of us have forgotten about the Berlin Wall and the Cold War, or never knew, would fill a book. And here is that book: Tunnel 29.
At times it seemed like the Cold War, an ideological and economic conflict between the US and the USSR, focused on Berlin, the capital of Germany. It was indeed the point of closest friction between the communist and capitalist worlds from 1945 to 1989. At the end of World War 2, Germany was divided into four zones, each to be administered by one of the major Allied Powers. Berlin, located 100 miles inside the Soviet Zone, was similarly divided, creating a boundary through the middle of a densely populated urban area, following and dividing streets, alleys, the river, and arbitrary lines. In the early days, movement of people and municipal services was relatively open across the zones of Berlin.
That ended abruptly in 1961 when the communist government of East Germany decided to stop the outflow of people and talent to the West. Overnight, the boundary became real, first with barbed wire and soon with a concrete wall, and eventually with a 100-meter kill strip in front of the Wall. The Wall was also enforced by the Stasi, a secret police organization that recruited informants that informed on friends, family, neighbors and strangers.
Yet the pressure for East Berliners to move west continued. Family and relatives were on the other side. So were better jobs, better consumer goods, and political freedom. Human ingenuity worked tirelessly on means of escape: forged papers, hiding in cars and trucks, and tunnels.
In Tunnel 29, Helena Merriman gives us an intimate view into the digging of one of these tunnels – well, actually two. Researching escape projects after 50 years surely limited her choices, but she found Joachim Rudolph, a key member of this tunnel team, who had detailed recall of this project. From his memories she is able to take us inside the tunnel, appreciate the student engineering the diggers used to construct the 120-meter tunnel, remove the dirt, brace the structure and locate the terminal point. She retells the flooding that led the diggers to try an alternate tunnel, then revert to the first location after the sub rosa cooperation of the West Berlin water authorities cured the flooding. Yes, the tunnel was dug from West Berlin into East. The excellent Stasi documentation let her trace and tell the story of Siegfried, a Stasi agent who infiltrated the project in order to report on it. She lets us see the organizing of the 29 East Berliners who would escape through the tunnel and the almost comedic work of Ellen Sesta on escape day, bringing the 29 to the tunnel opening in an East Berlin apartment. It is a tale of courage, fear, risk, circumstance, and determination.
Oh yes, and it was all documented by NBC TV News. Reuven Frank was new to TV journalism and needed a story. Joachim’s project needed resources and money. As we noted in our group’s discussion, you couldn’t get away with such an improbable tale in fiction. But it really did result in an award-winning TV documentary. It provided a great case study for discussion of journalistic ethics.
The thorough documentation of this particular escape allowed follow-up of the participants as they rebuilt their lives in West Germany. Some thrived in the capitalist world; others did not fare so well. Our group found this story compelling in its own right, but appreciated its extra dimensions of Cold War history, TV journalism, communist societies, and the role of walls today.
— Bill Smith

